A personal blog of Fr. John Wauck, a priest of the Opus Dei Prelature. See the truth about the Da Vinci Code and Opus Dei.
Find What You're Looking For:
Navigation
The Categories
The Archives
Posts By Date

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
Registered Users
  • 5 currently online
  • 36 maximum concurrent
  • 885549 total visitors
  • Subscribe
    • Entries
    • Comments
    • Ad
    Preview Image

    Yesterday, reading the Collector’s Edition of U.S. News and World Report
    dedicated to “The Secrets of Angels and Demons” – no I did not buy it! – I
    ran across this sentence: “In The Da Vinci Code, it was the mysterious
    Priory of Sion and the religious order, Opus Dei.” My heart sank a little, and I thought, enough
    is enough. Can’t we put at least of few of these chestnuts of
    misinformation to rest? So, for the journalists and all those who like to
    get their facts straight, here are a few classic FFS regarding Opus Dei.

    Is Opus Dei a religious order?

    Absolutely not. Opus Dei is NOT a religious order. When a
    man or woman makes a religious profession, that person enters into a
    special class within which they have chosen to pursue the goal of
    holiness. Members of Opus Dei very explicitly do NOT do this. The whole point of Opus Dei’s existence is to foster the pursuit
    of holiness among those who do not form part of that special class. It’s designed for the
    laity and the “secular clergy” (diocesan priests). In this sense,
    comparing Opus Dei with the Franciscans, Jesuits or Domincans is
    comparing apples and oranges, and many of the misunderstandings of Opus
    Dei stem from precisely this confusion: people expect members of Opus Dei
    to behave like members of a religious order, when they are NOT members of
    a religious order.

    The vast majority of the members of Opus Dei, all of whom share exactly the same
    vocation, are lay people (mostly married). There are also some priests who
    are, like diocesan priests, not members of any religious order, but rather
    secular clergy.

    Do members of Opus Dei take vows?

    No, members of Opus Dei do NOT take vows. This is really a
    corollary of the preceding question, since vows are one of the hallmarks
    of religious orders. Opus Dei is interested in virtues, not vows. For example, all members of Opus Dei strive to live the virtue of
    chastity to a heroic degree, and some members of Opus Dei (the numeraries
    and associates) have decided to live apostolic celibacy, but NO ONE takes
    vows of celibacy as a member of Opus Dei. The same goes for the virtues of poverty (detachment) and obedience, ven though some members give all their money to Opus Dei and try to be heroically obedient.

    Another corollary is that members of Opus Dei, like the ordinary lay
    Catholics that they are, do not wear habits or distinctive clothing.
    So forget about Silas and his capes and cowls and – am I the only one puzzled
    by this word? – his “swaddle.” (I can’t help imagining some kind of diaper. Pity the poor actor who pays him.)

    Is Opus Dei a personal prelature of the pope or the Vatican?

    Opus Dei is a personal prelature – so far, it’s the only one in the Church,
    but perhaps that will change – but not “of the pope or the Vatican.”

    A “prelature” is an ecclesiastical jurisdiction consisting of priests and
    laity under a prelate, which the Church establishes for some particular
    pastoral purpose. The purpose of Opus Dei is to foster and faciliate the
    pursuit of holiness in ordinary secular life.

    A “personal prelature” is a prelature that is defined not in terms of a
    geographical area (as is the case with dioceses), but rather in terms
    of particular persons, wherever they may happen to be. Thus the “personal”
    in personal prelature has NOTHING TO DO with the pope (pace Dan Brown) or even
    with the prelate; it does not mean that the prelature is someone’s personal
    fiefdom. It simply means that this prelature is defined by
    persons and not by land.

    A personal prelature is NOT a “church within the Church”. The members of
    Opus Dei ARE under the jurisdiction of the local bishops in exactly the
    same way as all ordinary Catholics are. Naturally, the priests
    incardinated in the prelature of Opus Dei are, like any diocesan priest,
    under the jurisdiction of their own bishop, who is, in this case, the
    prelate of Opus Dei. The laity of Opus Dei are under the jurisdiction of
    Opus Dei’s prelate only in those matters relating to the internal life of Opus
    Dei. There is no conflict between the prelate’s jurisdiction and that of
    the local bishop.

    Is The Way an Opus Dei manual?

    No. A glance at St. Josemaria’s book The Way is enough to make clear that
    it’s no treatise or guide to Opus Dei. In fact, Opus Dei is not even
    mentioned in The Way. The book is a collection of notes or “points” -
    drawn from the daily life and preaching of St. Josemaria in the 1930s -
    that were written in no particular order, and these jottings were later
    gathered into chapters. Some are lofty, some are very down to earth. Some
    are long, some are short. Some are crystal clear, others are rather opaque.

    Confusion about the nature of this book stems from the English title, The
    Way, which sounds as if it might be a how-to book for members of Opus Dei.
    But the original title in Spanish is simply Camino – with no definite
    article. The Spanish word means many things: “road¬®” “path,” “way,” “journey,” etc. The title then is not “THE road,”
    but simply “road.” (In fact, it’s more ambiguous than that, since the
    word “camino” can also be a verb: I walk.) But since the word “Way,” all by itself, would sound odd as a title, the English edition’s title was given a definite article
    that has turned out to be somewhat misleading.

    An even earlier version – much shorter and with very limited distribution -
    of Camino was simply called “Spiritual Considerations,” which is a very
    accurate, if somewhat prosaic, description of its contents.

    Well, these are the FFS that come immediately to my mind, but I bet that
    readers can think of a few others.

    ||Print This Post Print This Post  || Email This Post Email This Post ||

    2 Responses to this post
    1. Anthony Said:
      March 18th, 2006 at 10:15 pm

      Extremely useful, Fr. John, and more realistic than the cartoon of the monkeys!

    2. celebrities Said:
      April 13th, 2007 at 3:23 pm

      celebrities

    Feed: RSS
    Other Recent Posts

    dvc blog is back online!

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on January 26th.

    Don’t Skip This Ad: A Brand New Book!

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on November 28th.

    The Catholic Choice

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on November 2nd.

    Just When You Thought It Was Safe

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on September 24th.

    Juno/Juneau

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on September 2nd.

    Read It and Weep… with Laughter

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on August 23rd.

    The New Yorker: “Catholicism has everything else beat”

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on August 14th.

    Don’t Give Up on Europe

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on July 11th.

    B. in the U.S. A.: The Sheep Confirm the Shepherd’s Hope

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on April 27th.

    Catholicism’s Cultural Glass: Half Empty or Half Full?

    Filed under The Da Vinci Code. Created on April 13th.

    The Categories